QE in an unequal world

Important Information

We want to make investing with us simple and straightforward for all of our clients.

Please select your investor type from the options below.

Alternatively you can register or log in to an existing account.

Please note that by making your selection here you are agreeing to the Woodford Investment Management Ltd Privacy Statement and to our Terms and Conditions.

Neil Woodford 23 February 2015 Est. reading: 4 min read

One of the many topics for discussion by the World Economic Forum in recent years has been deepening income inequality. Indeed, it was identified as the most significant trend of 2015 by the forum’s experts.

It is therefore ironic that, as the world’s policy-making elite met in Davos last month, the European Central Bank introduced a policy that exacerbates inequality, with Germany finally conceding that the eurozone’s problems were significant enough to warrant a programme of Quantitative Easing (QE).

QE is money printing hidden behind a very poor disguise. Central banks create money electronically and with it, they buy assets, primarily sovereign bonds. The intention thereafter is that the institutional investors that have sold their sovereign bonds will reinvest in assets a little further up the risk spectrum. This forces the next seller to do the same and so on. Ultimately, the stated purpose of QE is to inflate the price of risk assets in the hope that, in so doing, the benefits of higher asset prices in the financial world will ‘trickle-down’ through the economy to provide a boost to activity in the real world.

Unfortunately, we have plentiful evidence from the last six years to confirm that the trickle-down simply does not work. The fruits of the policy are consumed in the financial world but the wider economy fails to benefit. On its own, QE does nothing to improve economic fundamentals.

What it does do is redistribute wealth. It makes the asset rich richer but the asset poor see no benefit and continue to be more exposed to the economy’s structural problems, such as high and rising youth unemployment, a lack of real wage growth and persistently high debt levels. Hence, we have wealth and income inequality in the western world rising to levels with which policy makers are clearly uncomfortable. Indeed, this undesirable unintended consequence of QE in the US was one of the primary reasons that the Federal Reserve abandoned it last year.

The European Central Bank’s decision to embark on a QE programme later this year followed months of speculation and eventually arrived against a backdrop of a weak and deteriorating economy. The eurozone already has negative inflation rates and the policy may have been introduced too late to avoid a more prolonged bout of deflation in the region than the brief period of falling prices that we saw in 2009.

Regardless of the fundamentals, however, global stock markets’ have enthusiastically greeted the prospect of QE in Europe. It has become a ‘knee-jerk’ reaction for risk assets to rally in anticipation of the next liquidity injection – the policy is, after all, designed to lift asset prices and it has succeeded in doing so in the past.

However, as we are all regularly reminded, past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future and there is good reason to believe that risk assets may ultimately behave differently this time. Firstly, we must consider valuation. When equities were cheap, QE fuelled a re-rating. That story has now played out, however, and stock markets now generally look much more fully valued. From here, it is much more difficult for markets to move materially higher. Indeed, in an environment where earnings are vulnerable to downgrades, global stock market indices are pregnant with risk.

Secondly, there is the Greek situation which, at the time of writing, remains unresolved and uncertain. Even if negotiations do conclude successfully, it is difficult to see how a compromise can provide a permanent solution to Greece’s problems whilst keeping the Germans happy at the same time. Europe’s troubles are not just confined to Greece though, albeit the current stand-off does epitomise well the region’s broader issues. In other words, the eurozone crisis will rumble on with the potential to upset financial markets at any time.

So there are good reasons, in my view, to question the market’s knee-jerk positive reaction to more QE. That’s not to say stock markets won’t continue to move higher – they might, but if they do it is likely to be through a further re-rating rather than earnings growth. In turn, this simply brings with it the ultimate risk of an even more significant correction when fundamentals eventually and inevitably reassert themselves.

From a strategy perspective, therefore, the introduction of QE from the ECB does not change the way my portfolios are invested. I remain focused on identifying attractively valued businesses that I believe are capable of delivering long-term returns in spite of all the headwinds. Fortunately, although stock market indices now look vulnerable more broadly, inequality exists in stock markets as well as economies. There remain some profoundly attractive investment opportunities and, by focusing my portfolios towards these, I continue to feel very confident about the prospect of delivering long-term positive returns.

This article first appeared in Money Marketing on 23 February 2015.

Woodford Investment Management Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (firm reference number 745433). Incorporated in England and Wales, company number 10118169. Registered address: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX.

© 2020 Woodford Investment Management Ltd.
All rights reserved.

Are you sure?

By disagreeing you will no longer have access to our site and will be logged out.

Privacy Preference Center

Experience Tracking

Lets our analytics service track you across our different websites and enables data sharing among our different marketing tools.

AMCV_[Tracker ID]@AdobeOrg (Adobe), [Tracker ID]@AdobeOrg (Adobe)
Adobe Analytics (helps us provide you with more relevant experiences and content based on your likely interests). Cookies: demdex, dextp, dpm, DST, DSTJS
Twitter personalisation (by better understanding how devices are related, Twitter can use information from one device to help personalize the Twitter experience on another device). Cookies: personalization_id
Heap Analytics (provides metrics on user behaviour and actions throughout the site). Cookies: _gid, _hp2_id.[Tracker ID],_hp2_props.[Tracker ID], _ga, _mkto_trk, optimizelyBuckets, optimizelyEndUserId, optimizelySegments, raygun4js-userid, _attribution_referrer, _csrf
Adobe Analytics (provides you with more relevant experiences and marketing messages based on your likely interests). Cookies: _tmae ,ev_sync_dd,ev_sync_yh,everest_g_v2,gglck

Traffic Metrics

Allows Woodford to aggregate information on website usage and popular content

_ga, _gid
Google Analytics (tracks and reports website traffic and user behaviour): Cookie: CONSENT
New Relic (application and server performance monitoring – allows us to spot problems with our website code and improve them to keep things running smoothly). Cookie: JSESSIONID
Adobe Analytics (provides you with more relevant experiences and marketing messages based on your likely interests). Cookies: __qca,__smToken, _ga, _mkto_trk, _rtbmedia

Search History

Populates the 'recent searches' section of the website navigation.


Close your account?

Your account will be closed and all data will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. Are you sure?