We are in a bubble

Important Information

We want to make investing with us simple and straightforward for all of our clients.

Please select your investor type from the options below.

Alternatively you can register or log in to an existing account.

Please note that by making your selection here you are agreeing to the Woodford Investment Management Ltd Privacy Statement and to our Terms and Conditions.

Neil Woodford 4 December 2017 Est. reading: 4 min read

Home > Words > Blog > We are in a bubble

Many of you may have read press coverage in recent days that Neil believes we are in an investment bubble. We have encapsulated those views in the blog post and short video below where Neil explains what it means for investors in his funds.

In summary: what does this mean for investors?

  • Valuation stretch in markets now at extreme levels
  • Unsustainable bubble in some parts of the stock market and other financial assets
  • Woodford portfolios positioned away from the bubble risk – remain capable of delivering positive long term returns

Ten years on from the global financial crisis, we are witnessing the product of the biggest monetary policy experiment in history. Investors have forgotten about risk and this is playing out in inflated asset prices and inflated valuations. Whether it’s Bitcoin going through $10,000, European junk bonds yielding less than US Treasuries, historic low levels of volatility or smart beta ETFs attracting gigantic inflows – there are so many lights flashing red that I am losing count.

The valuation stretch in the stock market has increasingly concerned me over the last couple of years and the chart below brought home to me just how drastic the situation has become.

What we see here is the stretch away from trend, between the performance of US value stocks and US growth stocks. It tells you all you need to know about current market conditions across the globe.

US equities – value vs growth differential has never been this extreme

Source: Woodford, based on Fama and French data

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 0 -3 1 -2 2 -1 Standard deviations from trendWall Street CrashNifty-fifty bubbleDotcom bubbleDo you see what we see?

The difference between the performance of value stocks and growth stocks today, is greater than at any stage in stock market history. Let that sink in…

We’ve had our fair share of bubbles in this period, as highlighted on the chart. The Wall Street Crash looks like a tiny blip compared to some of the other periods of market madness that we have seen, when fundamentals become irrelevant and animal spirits take over temporarily as the primary driver of share prices.

Obviously, the late nineties dotcom bubble was a painful period of performance for me – its impact on valuation stretch is all too visibly acute on the chart but, in the context of history, it was a brief dislocation. By focusing resolutely on fundamentals, my funds enjoyed a meaningful period of positive performance when the bubble burst, continuing to rise in value as the market plummeted in 2000 and 2001.

There are echoes of the tech bubble today. More similar, however, to the current predicament, was the nifty-fifty bubble which afflicted stock markets in the late 1960s and early 1970s. A narrow group of so-called “one-decision” stocks with dependable growth characteristics enjoyed a run of popularity with investors that took their valuations to extreme, unsustainable levels. I wrote about in the FT in 2010, explaining that, “when growth is hard to come by for the wider economy, investors are prepared to pay for companies that can provide growth in shareholder returns no matter what the economy throws at them.”

Mark Twain once famously said, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes”. The market appears to be making the same mistakes again, but this time the bubble has grown even bigger and even more dangerous. In a challenging global economic environment, the few stocks that are perceived to be capable of delivering dependable growth have, like in the early-1970s, become very popular and that popularity has manifested itself in extreme and unsustainable valuations.

I have owned some of the stocks that have benefited from this trend – Reckitt Benckiser, for example, is a very high quality business which I would be delighted to invest in again at the appropriate price. But on the basis of valuation, I have sold it, and others like it, from the portfolios, replacing them with positions which look much more attractively valued.

That is a consistent feature of bubbles – there is always a subset of the market which falls out of favour as investors clamour for the fashionable stocks of the day, providing the fuel to power the bubble on through the final leg of its journey before it bursts.

In the dotcom bubble it was the old economy stocks – today, in the UK stock market, it is domestically-focused stocks which have become profoundly unloved and undervalued. The funds I manage are positioned to exploit this opportunity and I am utterly convinced it will pay-off when the bubble bursts, which I believe it inevitably will.

Timing such an event is not easy but there are certain events on the horizon that could prompt the market to acknowledge that some parts of the global growth outlook are nowhere near as benign as it has complacently believed. More on that in the near future – but in the meantime, investors should take stock of the risks that exist in many parts of the market.

Investors should be careful chasing the zeitgeist. The temptations and excesses are right here, right now. There is always risk when markets become obsessed and extreme but there is also opportunity – an opportunity to capture assets at incredibly depressed valuations, the likes of which I have only seen two or three times during my 30-year career.

What are the risks?

  • The value of investments and any income from them may go down as well as up, so you may get back less than you invested
  • Past performance cannot be relied upon as a guide to future performance
  • The annual management charge applicable to the funds is charged to capital, so the income of the funds may be higher but capital growth may be restricted or capital may be eroded
  • The funds may invest in other transferable securities, money market instruments, warrants, collective investment schemes and deposits
  • The funds may invest in overseas securities and be exposed to currencies other than pound sterling.
  • The LF Woodford Income Focus Fund will be invested in a concentrated portfolio of securities – the fund is not restricted by reference to any geographical region, sector or market capitalisation
  • The LF Woodford Equity Income Fund may invest in unquoted securities, which may be less liquid and more difficult to realise than publicly traded securities

Important information

Before investing, you should read the Key Investor Information Document (KIID) for the fund, and the Prospectus which, along with our terms and conditions, can be obtained from the downloads page or from our registered office. If you have a financial adviser, you should seek their advice before investing. Woodford Investment Management Ltd is not authorised to provide investment advice.

You should note that capital is at risk with these investments and you may get back less than you invested. The value of the fund or trust as well as any income paid will fluctuate which may partly be the result of exchange rate changes.

The price of shares in the Woodford Patient Capital Trust is determined by market supply and demand, and this may be different to the net asset value of the trust.

The Woodford Patient Capital Trust currently intends to conduct its affairs so that its securities can be recommended by IFAs to ordinary retail investors in accordance with the FCA’s rules in relation to non-mainstream investment products and intends to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The securities are excluded from the FCA’s restrictions which apply to non-mainstream investment products because they are shares in an investment trust.

Young businesses have a different risk profile to mature blue-chip companies – risks are much more stock-specific, which implies a lower correlation with equity markets and the wider economy. Long-term outcomes are more binary – extremely attractive rewards for success but some businesses will inevitably fail to fulfil their potential and this may expose Woodford Patient Capital Trust investors to the risk of capital losses. As it can take years for young businesses to fulfil their potential, this investment requires patience.

Woodford Investment Management Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (firm reference number 745433). Incorporated in England and Wales, company number 10118169. Registered address 9400 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2HN.

Woodford Patient Capital Trust plc is incorporated in England and Wales, company number 09405653. Registered as an investment company under section 833 of the Companies Act 2006. Registered address Beaufort House, 51 New North Road, Exeter, EX4 4EP.

The Woodford Funds (Ireland) ICAV (the “Fund”) has appointed as Swiss Representative Oligo Swiss Fund Services SA, Av. Villamont 17, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland. The Fund’s Swiss paying agent is Neue Helvetische Bank AG. All fund documentation including, Prospectus, Key Investor Information Documents, Instrument of Incorporation and financial reports may be obtained free of charge from the Swiss Representative in Lausanne. The place of performance and jurisdiction for all shares distributed in or from Switzerland is at the registered office of the Swiss Representative. Fund prices can be found at www.fundinfo.com.

© 2017 Woodford Investment Management Ltd.
All rights reserved.

By using this website you are automatically agreeing to the Woodford Investment Management Ltd privacy statement